Earlier this week
Brazil rejected an international plan to buy and protect large tracts of the Amazon rainforest. Environment minister, Marina Silva, cited sovereignty issues and Brazilian support for their own rainforest-protection plan as the basis for their rejection.
The quandry facing Brazil, a country with vast poverty and vast natural resources, is one the that is all too common around the globe. Even in developed nations like the good'ol USA -- development, oil drilling, strip mining and Federal Land Use are very contentious subjects not always decided in the environment's favor.
A gaping hole in the Kyoto protocol is the provision that exempts developing nations from playing a role in the reduction of greenhouse emissions. Until economic issues are resolved developing nations will continue to reach deep into their cookie jar of natural resources to feed their poor and line the pockets of government and business criminals.
I believe Brazil has every right to responsibly control the harvesting of their natural resources (though they've done a tragically crappy job thus far). But I would help them make the right choices through a combination of incentives and/or trade restictions that promote sustainable practices and preservation of the rainforest. If no market exists for ill-gotten gains of the burning rainforest, then the destruction will slow. They are now looking at reducing the advance of "progress" to 1990's levels, which is not enough, but probably practical. Unfortunately the ultimate end to the burning may be when the last tree goes up in flames sometime later this century.
g