Is More Air Pollution the Answer?

Is global shading a practical antidote to global warming? Could more particulate matter splooged into the atmosphere protect the earth from harmful ultra-violet rays? Do we need to face the fact that we can't reduce our production of emissions so we should create more? Is smog laden L.A. really a model city in the fight against global warming?

Nobel Prize winning scientist, Paul J. Crutzen, of Germany's Max Planck Institute for Chemistry presented just such a proposal to a U.N. conference on climate change. "If they don't take action much more strongly than they have in the past, then in the end we have to do experiments like this." CNN STORY
Crutzen made the proposal to increase particulate pollution in the atmosphere, partly for shock value in reaction to a "grossly disappointing international political response" to global warming.

Scientists are actually discussing this type of solution to a global warming problem that is spiraling out of control and unchecked. This weekend at Moffett Field, California, NASA's Ames Research Center hosts a closed-door, high-level workshop on the global haze proposal and other "geoengineering" ideas for fending off climate change.

Kofe Annan is stating global warming is a great a danger and as immediate a problem as Weapons of Mass Destruction.
LINK

Can this ship get turned around?
g